Optimizing your Thermal Oxidizer

Sharing is caring!

Thermal oxidizers require significant amounts of energy to achieve their meant benefit. One of the reasons for this is that treatment of the process exhaust air requires heating to the highest autoignition temperature of compounds to be oxidized. The combustion chamber temperature can typically range from 1,400ºF to 1,700ºF, or higher as needed. Although various configurations exist to improve on energy efficiencies, thermal oxidizers remain a considerable person of natural gas and electricity.

A good starting point with thermal oxidizers is to consider use of a secondary warmth exchanger as a way to recoup warmth from the thermal oxidizer’s exhaust. Energy recovered can be utilized to heat recent air, recirculated air, water, thermal oil, or steam. The quantity of warmth recouped varies with the types of thermal oxidizer. Clearly, the more thermally environment friendly the oxidizer, the less available warmth there is to recover from its exhaust, though there are some necessary exceptions.

Types of Thermal Oxidizers and Warmth Recovery

Non-recuperative direct fired thermal oxidizers are typically used in situationswith high concentrations of risky organic compounds (VOC) and/or https://www.tksindustrial.com/thermal-oxidizer-projects the place minimal initial capital funding is required. Though this type of thermal oxidizer is low in up-front capital cost, the operating prices may be very high, especially when the quantity or composition of VOCs provides little supplemental warmth to the combustion chamber (low warmth of combustion energy relative to the mass of exhaust). Since no warmth recovery is included with this type of oxidizer, the high outlet temperature of non-recuperative oxidizers makes them excellent candidates for secondary energy recovery.

Recuperative thermal oxidizers differ from non-recuperative systems by incorporating a warmth exchanger to pre-warmth the process exhaust air previous to entering the combustion chamber. Mass corrected thermal efficiencies (MCTE) typically range from 60% to sixty five% and can sometimes provide as high as 70% MCTE. While this could appear high, it is in need of what could be achieved by RTOs and, therefore, gives good energy recovery opportunities.

Regenerative thermal oxidizers (RTO) had been developed to optimize utilization of energy. By alternating the process flow previous warmth-capturing ceramic media, heat is transferred from theRTO exhaust air back to the incoming process exhaust air. RTOs readily achieve 95%+ MCTE which, at first glance, may only appear to provide longer term heat recovery returns on funding, nonetheless, there are situations which significantly decrease the time needed to justify the price of heat recovery equipment.

If the VOC focus getting into the combustion chamber is high sufficient, the operation becomes auto-thermal, which is to say, the combustion of VOCs is self-sustaining. No additional warmth is needed from the burner. VOC focus above auto-thermal result in excess heat not required to keep up the oxidation process.

In auto-thermal cases, as soon as the chamber temperature will increase above the combustion chamber set point, a hot gas bypass system is activated. Temperature within the chamber is managed by a variable energy recovery (VER) system which opens a bypass damper to permit a certain portion of the recent gas from the burner chamber to bypass the ceramic heat change media. This sizzling gas stream gives an excellent supply of recoverable heat.